Quantcast
Channel: SQL Server Analysis Services Forum
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2472

Many to many vs surrogate and data duplication

$
0
0

Hi All,

I am trying to work out the best way of modeling some data in analysis services.  I have two possible ways of doing it so far and I am looking for some guidance on the best way of doing it.

I am working with 3 dimension like objects, call them group, item and sub-item, which together form a sort of hierarchy.  An item contains many sub-items.  A group contains many items.  An item can exist in many groups.

The two options I have currently for modelling this data are as follows:

1. Use surrogate keys to duplicate all the item and sub-item (and fact table) data per group.  Once the data has been duplicated I can create a single dimension with a hierarchy in it to access the data.

2. Store the the sub-item and fact table data once.  Duplicate the item data per group and use a bridge table to link the surrogate item data to the appropriate sub-item.

Coming from a SQL background using the many-many solution makes more sense to me, however as I understand it many-to-many relationships should be avoided where possible.  Duplicating the data to the extent needed for option 1 seems excessive though.

Does anyone have any ideas of the best way of modelling this?

Thanks


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2472

Trending Articles